Two Bad Pro-Life Responses to Bodily Rights Arguments

The Equal Rights Institute Podcast

Kandungan disediakan oleh Equal Rights Institute. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh Equal Rights Institute atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.

6y ago 5:11

MP3•Laman utama episod

Even before ERI officially began, Josh and Tim cared a lot about helping pro-life people to think well and take pro-choice arguments seriously. They don’t think every single pro-choice argument is a good argument (there are a lot of really bad arguments on both sides), but we won’t be persuasive unless we can recognize and take the stronger pro-choice arguments seriously. In this piece, Josh addresses two bad pro-life responses to some of the stronger pro-choice arguments.

Related Links:

Josh Brahm: Understanding and Responding to Bodily Rights Arguments (includes Josh's speech): http://bit.ly/2mZugjg

The Alan Guttmacher Institute’s 2005 survey of more than 1,200 abortion patients: http://bit.ly/2IQs9VO Timothy Brahm: Autumn in the Sovereign Zone: Why “It’s My Body, I Can Do What I Want” Won’t Do: http://bit.ly/2x3TugP

Judith Jarvis Thomson’s violinist story or “people-seeds” analogy: http://bit.ly/2I0D4v0

Share the original article: http://bit.ly/2gBTlv8

ERI Website: https://EqualRightsInstitute.com

ERI Blog: https://Blog.EqualRightsInstitute.com

ERI Course: https://EquippedCourse.com

133 episod

#Non-Profit #Apologetics #Equalrightsinstitute #Prolifics #Politics #Business #Equal Rights Institute #News