Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
32 subscribers
Checked 24d ago
Добавлено пять года назад
Kandungan disediakan oleh Better Informed Network. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh Better Informed Network atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplikasi Podcast
Pergi ke luar talian dengan aplikasi Player FM !
Pergi ke luar talian dengan aplikasi Player FM !
Podcast Berbaloi untuk Didengar
DITAJA
E
Exile
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbf64/cbf643f0737c07eafa2916024feb3be0e2fc7c74" alt="Exile podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Exile podcast artwork"
1 Episode 21: The Heiress Who Helped End School Segregation 35:10
35:10
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai35:10data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
Hilde Mosse comes from one of the wealthiest families in Berlin and stands to inherit an enormous fortune. But she longs for something more meaningful than the luxurious lifestyle her family provides. So Hilde decides to pursue her dream of becoming a doctor. As the Nazis take power in Germany and the Mosse family is forced to flee, Dr. Hilde Mosse lands in New York having nearly lost everything.. She finds her calling treating the mental health of Black youth – and the symptoms of a racist system. In addition to photographs, school records, and correspondence spanning Hilde Mosse’s entire lifetime, the Mosse Family Collection in the LBI Archives includes the diaries she kept between 1928 and 1934, from the ages of 16-22. Hilde’s papers are just part of the extensive holdings related to the Mosse Family at LBI. Learn more at lbi.org/hilde . Exile is a production of the Leo Baeck Institute, New York and Antica Productions. It’s narrated by Mandy Patinkin. This episode was written by Lauren Armstrong-Carter. Our executive producers are Laura Regehr, Rami Tzabar, Stuart Coxe, and Bernie Blum. Our producer is Emily Morantz. Research and translation by Isabella Kempf. Voice acting by Hannah Gelman. Sound design and audio mix by Philip Wilson. Theme music by Oliver Wickham. Please consider supporting the work of the Leo Baeck Institute with a tax-deductible contribution by visiting lbi.org/exile2025 . The entire team at Antica Productions and Leo Baeck Institute is deeply saddened by the passing of our Executive Producer, Bernie Blum. We would not have been able to tell these stories without Bernie's generous support. Bernie was also President Emeritus of LBI and Exile would not exist without his energetic and visionary leadership. We extend our condolences to his entire family. May his memory be a blessing. This episode of Exile is made possible in part by a grant from the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, which is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Finance and the Foundation Remembrance, Responsibility and Future.…
Supreme Court of the United States
Tandakan semua sebagai (belum) dimainkan
Manage series 2558408
Kandungan disediakan oleh Better Informed Network. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh Better Informed Network atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
341 episod
Tandakan semua sebagai (belum) dimainkan
Manage series 2558408
Kandungan disediakan oleh Better Informed Network. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh Better Informed Network atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
341 episod
Все серии
×S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44
1:30:44
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:30:44data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57
1:15:57
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:15:57data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53
1:13:53
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:13:53data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12
1:12:12
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:12:12data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32
2:05:32
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai2:05:32data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 49:01
49:01
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai49:01data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03
1:17:03
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:17:03data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:18:04
1:18:04
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:18:04data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act , a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:30:43
1:30:43
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:30:43data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act ’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025] 2:28:50
2:28:50
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai2:28:50data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act , as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024] 1:10:58
1:10:58
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:10:58data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024] 1:50:37
1:50:37
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:50:37data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:13:34
1:13:34
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:13:34data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:26:52
1:26:52
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai1:26:52data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and whether all contract rights are “property.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70541/705412cab270079506bf0f8a563d70dc131145fb" alt="Supreme Court of the United States podcast artwork"
1 U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024] 2:21:11
2:21:11
Main Kemudian
Main Kemudian
Senarai
Suka
Disukai2:21:11data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 , which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
Selamat datang ke Player FM
Player FM mengimbas laman-laman web bagi podcast berkualiti tinggi untuk anda nikmati sekarang. Ia merupakan aplikasi podcast terbaik dan berfungsi untuk Android, iPhone, dan web. Daftar untuk melaraskan langganan merentasi peranti.