The Jacaranda FM News team is based in Gauteng – but covers local and international news of the day, providing the latest developments online and on-air. News bulletins run from 5am to 7pm weekdays, and from 7am to 6pm on weekends and public holidays. Tune into Jacaranda FM, or log on to www.jacarandafm.com, for the news you need to know.. now.
…
continue reading
Kandungan disediakan oleh Bobby Capucci. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh Bobby Capucci atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplikasi Podcast
Pergi ke luar talian dengan aplikasi Player FM !
Pergi ke luar talian dengan aplikasi Player FM !
The USVI And Their Reply Memo In Support To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Suit (9/2/24)
MP3•Laman utama episod
Manage episode 437622733 series 2987886
Kandungan disediakan oleh Bobby Capucci. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh Bobby Capucci atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
The Government of the United States Virgin Islands, in their reply to support the motion to dismiss, argues that the court lacks both personal and subject matter jurisdiction over them. They assert that the plaintiffs have not provided sufficient factual evidence to demonstrate why the court should have jurisdiction in this case. Additionally, the government contends that even if jurisdiction were proper, the plaintiffs’ claims do not satisfy the legal requirements necessary to move forward. They argue the complaints are either too vague, improperly framed, or fail to establish a concrete legal basis for proceeding under federal law.
Moreover, the reply emphasizes procedural issues and questions the standing of the plaintiffs, arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims do not establish direct harm that would warrant court intervention. The government also points out that the claims are based on speculative allegations rather than solid, actionable facts. They conclude by urging the court to dismiss the case to prevent unnecessary litigation and uphold the integrity of legal standards that require clear, actionable claims and appropriate jurisdictional grounds.
(commercial at 9:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.158.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
…
continue reading
Moreover, the reply emphasizes procedural issues and questions the standing of the plaintiffs, arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims do not establish direct harm that would warrant court intervention. The government also points out that the claims are based on speculative allegations rather than solid, actionable facts. They conclude by urging the court to dismiss the case to prevent unnecessary litigation and uphold the integrity of legal standards that require clear, actionable claims and appropriate jurisdictional grounds.
(commercial at 9:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.158.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
1098 episod
MP3•Laman utama episod
Manage episode 437622733 series 2987886
Kandungan disediakan oleh Bobby Capucci. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh Bobby Capucci atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
The Government of the United States Virgin Islands, in their reply to support the motion to dismiss, argues that the court lacks both personal and subject matter jurisdiction over them. They assert that the plaintiffs have not provided sufficient factual evidence to demonstrate why the court should have jurisdiction in this case. Additionally, the government contends that even if jurisdiction were proper, the plaintiffs’ claims do not satisfy the legal requirements necessary to move forward. They argue the complaints are either too vague, improperly framed, or fail to establish a concrete legal basis for proceeding under federal law.
Moreover, the reply emphasizes procedural issues and questions the standing of the plaintiffs, arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims do not establish direct harm that would warrant court intervention. The government also points out that the claims are based on speculative allegations rather than solid, actionable facts. They conclude by urging the court to dismiss the case to prevent unnecessary litigation and uphold the integrity of legal standards that require clear, actionable claims and appropriate jurisdictional grounds.
(commercial at 9:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.158.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
…
continue reading
Moreover, the reply emphasizes procedural issues and questions the standing of the plaintiffs, arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims do not establish direct harm that would warrant court intervention. The government also points out that the claims are based on speculative allegations rather than solid, actionable facts. They conclude by urging the court to dismiss the case to prevent unnecessary litigation and uphold the integrity of legal standards that require clear, actionable claims and appropriate jurisdictional grounds.
(commercial at 9:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.158.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
1098 episod
Alle Folgen
×Selamat datang ke Player FM
Player FM mengimbas laman-laman web bagi podcast berkualiti tinggi untuk anda nikmati sekarang. Ia merupakan aplikasi podcast terbaik dan berfungsi untuk Android, iPhone, dan web. Daftar untuk melaraskan langganan merentasi peranti.