))
Life is complicated, but we love simple answers. AI and robotics are changing the nature of work. Emojis change the way we write. Fossil Fuels were once the engine of progress, now we're in a race to change how we power the planet. We're constantly trying to save ourselves...from ourselves. Join Anthropologist and culture expert Dr. Adam Gamwell for curated conversations with humanity’s top makers and minds on our creative potential through design, culture, business and technology. Change yo ...
Episode 74: Conspiracy Theories as Belief Systems w/ Dr. Uscinski and Dr. Enders
Manage episode 316714031 series 2902743
Oleh Daniel Chadborn and Thomas Brooks, Daniel Chadborn, and Thomas Brooks ditemui oleh Player FM dan komuniti kami - hak cipta dimiliki oleh penerbit, bukan Player FM, dan audio distrim secara langsung dari pelayan mereka. Tekan butang Langgan untuk mengesan kemas kini di Player FM, atau tampal suapan URL ke dalam aplikasi podcast lain.
Episode 74 of our book read/podcast covering major topics in various fields of psychology explores yet another mini-series, a flex course on CONSPIRACIES this holiday season, with guests, deep dives and more. In Part IV or our conspiracy theory discussion, Daniel and Thomas are joined by Dr. Joseph Uscinski and Dr. Adam Enders to talk about belief systems in relation to conspiracy theories and their article “Do conspiracy beliefs form a belief system?”.
For more about Dr. Uscinski and Ender’s work, you can find them here:
Dr. Joseph Uscinski
https://twitter.com/JoeUscinski
Dr. Adam Enders
PSD Website: https://psychosocialdistancingpodcast.com/
Thomas' Webpage: https://sexography.org/
Thomas' Twitter: https://twitter.com/TBrooks_SexPsy
Daniel's Twitter: https://twitter.com/ScienceInChaos
Bias of the Week: Conjunction Fallacy
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h3r_CNg_MuRKbi_oJYVRth7dAMW2nNiS/view?usp=sharing
Conjunction fallacy
The tendency to assume that specific conditions are more probable than general ones.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
115 episod
