Show notes are at https://stevelitchfield.com/sshow/chat.html
…
continue reading
Kandungan disediakan oleh LessWrong. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh LessWrong atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplikasi Podcast
Pergi ke luar talian dengan aplikasi Player FM !
Pergi ke luar talian dengan aplikasi Player FM !
“Information vs Assurance” by johnswentworth
MP3•Laman utama episod
Manage episode 452278937 series 3364760
Kandungan disediakan oleh LessWrong. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh LessWrong atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
In contract law, there's this thing called a “representation”. Example: as part of a contract to sell my house, I might “represent that” the house contains no asbestos. How is this different from me just, y’know, telling someone that the house contains no asbestos? Well, if it later turns out that the house does contain asbestos, I’ll be liable for any damages caused by the asbestos (like e.g. the cost of removing it).
In other words: a contractual representation is a factual claim along with insurance against that claim being false.
I claim[1] that people often interpret everyday factual claims and predictions in a way similar to contractual representations. Because “representation” is egregiously confusing jargon, I’m going to call this phenomenon “assurance”.
Prototypical example: I tell my friend that I plan to go to a party around 9 pm, and I’m willing to give them a ride. My friend [...]
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 20th, 2024
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/p9rQJMRq4qtB9acds/information-vs-assurance
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
…
continue reading
In other words: a contractual representation is a factual claim along with insurance against that claim being false.
I claim[1] that people often interpret everyday factual claims and predictions in a way similar to contractual representations. Because “representation” is egregiously confusing jargon, I’m going to call this phenomenon “assurance”.
Prototypical example: I tell my friend that I plan to go to a party around 9 pm, and I’m willing to give them a ride. My friend [...]
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 20th, 2024
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/p9rQJMRq4qtB9acds/information-vs-assurance
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
378 episod
MP3•Laman utama episod
Manage episode 452278937 series 3364760
Kandungan disediakan oleh LessWrong. Semua kandungan podcast termasuk episod, grafik dan perihalan podcast dimuat naik dan disediakan terus oleh LessWrong atau rakan kongsi platform podcast mereka. Jika anda percaya seseorang menggunakan karya berhak cipta anda tanpa kebenaran anda, anda boleh mengikuti proses yang digariskan di sini https://ms.player.fm/legal.
In contract law, there's this thing called a “representation”. Example: as part of a contract to sell my house, I might “represent that” the house contains no asbestos. How is this different from me just, y’know, telling someone that the house contains no asbestos? Well, if it later turns out that the house does contain asbestos, I’ll be liable for any damages caused by the asbestos (like e.g. the cost of removing it).
In other words: a contractual representation is a factual claim along with insurance against that claim being false.
I claim[1] that people often interpret everyday factual claims and predictions in a way similar to contractual representations. Because “representation” is egregiously confusing jargon, I’m going to call this phenomenon “assurance”.
Prototypical example: I tell my friend that I plan to go to a party around 9 pm, and I’m willing to give them a ride. My friend [...]
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 20th, 2024
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/p9rQJMRq4qtB9acds/information-vs-assurance
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
…
continue reading
In other words: a contractual representation is a factual claim along with insurance against that claim being false.
I claim[1] that people often interpret everyday factual claims and predictions in a way similar to contractual representations. Because “representation” is egregiously confusing jargon, I’m going to call this phenomenon “assurance”.
Prototypical example: I tell my friend that I plan to go to a party around 9 pm, and I’m willing to give them a ride. My friend [...]
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
October 20th, 2024
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/p9rQJMRq4qtB9acds/information-vs-assurance
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
378 episod
Semua episod
×Selamat datang ke Player FM
Player FM mengimbas laman-laman web bagi podcast berkualiti tinggi untuk anda nikmati sekarang. Ia merupakan aplikasi podcast terbaik dan berfungsi untuk Android, iPhone, dan web. Daftar untuk melaraskan langganan merentasi peranti.